Evaluating Ilmenite Mud as a Substitute for Fly Ash in Cement

A recent article published in Materials presented a microstructural assessment of rinsed ilmenite mud waste (R-MUD) in Portland cement composites. The study compared the influence of R-MUD to that of fly ash (FA) in similar cement composites.

Evaluating Ilmenite Mud as a Substitute for Fly Ash in Cement
Study: Ilmenite Mud in Cement Composites: A Fly Ash Alternative? Image Credit: Sidorov_Ruslan/Shutterstock.com

Background

The cement industry contributes over 5 % of the total anthropogenic CO2 emissions. To mitigate these emissions, various waste and by-products, such as furnace slag, fly ash, and silica fumes, are already used in cement production. Fly ash, generated from the combustion of hard coal, is particularly useful for concrete. However, as the construction industry moves towards sustainability, the demand for high-quality fly ash has increased, necessitating novel additives in cement production to address the fly ash deficit.

Ilmenite mud, a by-product of titanium dioxide production, can be safely valorized in factories as R-MUD. It demonstrates comparable or even superior pozzolanic activity to fly ash and is useful as an additive in cement composites. However, despite its relatively low content of reactive silicon dioxide compared to fly ash, the behavior of R-MUD has not been fully explained in previous studies. Therefore, this study microstructurally assessed the pozzolanic activity of R-MUD in comparison to fly ash in a cement matrix.

Methods

A standard mortar base was modified by replacing 10.8 wt.% of cement with either R-MUD or FA. Two mortar samples of each composition were molded and studied after curing periods of 7, 14, 28, 90, 180, and 360 days. X-Ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed on samples ground to a particle size of less than 0.063 mm to determine the phase composition of the mortars, their semiquantitative changes over time, and changes in the amorphous phase.

Thermal properties of the powdered samples were analyzed through differential thermal analysis (DTA) to precisely determine changes in constituent quantities, mainly portlandite and calcite, during curing. The R3 bound water test was conducted to demonstrate the pozzolanic activity of R-MUD and compare it to FA. The activity analysis of the supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) involved preparing their paste with calcium hydroxide, water, and other constituents.

Mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) was performed to analyze pore distribution variations in the cement matrix containing R-MUD and FA during curing. The parameters studied included total porosity, pore size range, average pore volume and diameter, and median pore volume and diameter.

The surface morphology of the mortars with R-MUD and FA was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after 360 days of curing. This helped determine the differences in the microstructure of both mortars by analyzing the calcium-silicate-hydrate (C-S-H) phase.

Results and Discussion

The researchers compared the pozzolanic reactivity of R-MUD mortar to FA mortar by analyzing the test results. XRD data revealed that R-MUD had lower silicon dioxide and aluminum oxide content than fly ash. However, R-MUD exhibited higher reactivity, likely due to its higher content of colloidal silicon dioxide.

Thermograms of FA mortar cured for 360 days were similar to those of R-MUD mortar, but the C-S-H phase composition differed. FA mortar showed a higher loss of mass related to portlandite, indicating that the reaction between FA and portlandite was weaker compared to R-MUD. Furthermore, the R3 bound water test demonstrated that FA had more bound water than R-MUD, affecting its potential activity.

The MIP test revealed differences in the microstructure sealing efficiency of R-MUD and FA mortars. While the pore size transformation type was similar in both, it was slower in FA samples. Initially, the microstructure sealing process was the same for both types of mortar, but for FA, it eventually slowed down and nearly stopped after 360 days of curing.

SEM images analyzed the microstructure of R-MUD and FA mortars cured for 360 days, revealing the sealing properties of the C-S-H phase and various transition zones between grout, aggregate, fly ash, and R-MUD constituents. Both mortars showed similar sealing, but in R-MUD mortar, sealed areas dominated, whereas the opposite was true for FA mortar.

Conclusion

Overall, R-MUD proved to be a valuable substitute for FA in cement composites. The study demonstrated that R-MUD is a pozzolanic reactive material with properties similar to or better than FA as a supplementary cementitious material. This pozzolanic activity of R-MUD positively influences the pore size distribution and microstructure of the cement matrix.

However, the mechanism behind R-MUD’s activity differs from that of FA due to its lower silicon dioxide content. The higher reactivity of R-MUD is likely attributed to the colloidal form of silicon dioxide it contains. Further investigations are needed to fully understand the mechanisms behind the higher pozzolanic activity of R-MUD and its potential as a substitute for high-quality fly ash.

Journal Reference

Chyliński, F. (2024). Microstructural Assessment of Pozzolanic Activity of Ilmenite Mud Waste Compared to Fly Ash in Cement Composites. Materials17(11), 2483. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17112483, https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/17/11/2483

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Article Revisions

  • May 28 2024 - Title changed from "Ilmenite Mud in Cement Composites: A Fly Ash Alternative?" to "Evaluating Ilmenite Mud as a Substitute for Fly Ash in Cement"
Nidhi Dhull

Written by

Nidhi Dhull

Nidhi Dhull is a freelance scientific writer, editor, and reviewer with a PhD in Physics. Nidhi has an extensive research experience in material sciences. Her research has been mainly focused on biosensing applications of thin films. During her Ph.D., she developed a noninvasive immunosensor for cortisol hormone and a paper-based biosensor for E. coli bacteria. Her works have been published in reputed journals of publishers like Elsevier and Taylor & Francis. She has also made a significant contribution to some pending patents.  

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Dhull, Nidhi. (2024, May 28). Evaluating Ilmenite Mud as a Substitute for Fly Ash in Cement. AZoBuild. Retrieved on June 14, 2024 from https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=23522.

  • MLA

    Dhull, Nidhi. "Evaluating Ilmenite Mud as a Substitute for Fly Ash in Cement". AZoBuild. 14 June 2024. <https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=23522>.

  • Chicago

    Dhull, Nidhi. "Evaluating Ilmenite Mud as a Substitute for Fly Ash in Cement". AZoBuild. https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=23522. (accessed June 14, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Dhull, Nidhi. 2024. Evaluating Ilmenite Mud as a Substitute for Fly Ash in Cement. AZoBuild, viewed 14 June 2024, https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=23522.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.