New Review Finds Cement Could Go Low-Carbon — If We Get the Chemistry Right

A new review in npj Materials Sustainability argues that high-volume blended slag cements (HVBSCs)—mixes where more than 70 % of the clinker is replaced with ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS)—could play a key role in decarbonising the construction sector.

Study: Microstructural insights and technical challenges of effectively adopting high-volume GGBS in blended cements for low-carbon construction. Image Credit: Vera Larina/Shutterstock.com

By cutting clinker content and reusing a steel industry by-product, these cements can lower greenhouse gas emissions and improve durability. But the paper also points to significant technical challenges that need to be addressed before they can see widespread industrial use.

Hydration behaviour

The review draws on thermodynamic modeling, synchrotron spectroscopy, and laboratory testing to examine how HVBSCs hydrate. After 28 days, the main binding phase is calcium (alumino) silicate hydrate (C-(A-)S-H) gel, accompanied by portlandite, ettringite, monosulfate or monocarbonate aluminates, and magnesium–aluminum layered double hydroxides (Mg-Al-LDH).

Some compounds common in Portland cement, such as iron–siliceous hydrogarnet, can form rapidly, but direct evidence for these phases in HVBSCs remains limited. Increasing slag content lowers pore solution pH and reduces the calcium-to-silicon ratio, which slows early reactions. Above about 80 % replacement, however, aluminium released from the slag can help accelerate hydration at later stages, partly compensating for the initial slowdown.

Microstructural changes

These chemical shifts also alter the morphology of the binding gel. At low slag contents (under 30 %), it tends to form a linear, fibrillar network. Higher slag levels create a denser, foil-like nanostructure that can limit diffusivity and potentially improve durability.

Mechanical performance follows a similar pattern. Seven-day compressive strength falls as slag content increases, largely due to reduced early reactivity and clinker dilution. By 28 days, though, mixes with around 60 % GGBS can match the strength of Portland cement, as the slag’s latent hydraulic properties take over, aided by hydroxide ions released during dissolution.

Performance challenges

The review notes that up to 50% of GGBS replacements are already used in industrial projects—especially in marine construction—but higher volumes remain mostly confined to laboratory research. The main barriers are slower early strength gain, extended setting times, and lower reaction rates compared with Portland cement.

Researchers are investigating potential solutions, including chemical activators such as sodium hydroxide, sodium silicate, sodium sulfate, calcium sulfate, calcined layered double hydroxide, and sodium bicarbonate. Increasing curing temperatures to around 40 °C can also accelerate early reactions. More advanced additives, such as graphene-based materials and carbon nanotubes, are under study, though their cost limits large-scale adoption.

Outlook

HVBSCs are most promising in regions near steel production, where GGBS is abundant and affordable. In areas without local sources, transportation costs may offset environmental and economic benefits, making natural pozzolans a better option.

For marine environments, HVBSCs offer particular advantages due to their dense microstructure and potential for improved durability. However, the authors stress that broader adoption will require predictive modeling, optimized mix design for local materials, and robust performance standards.

If these challenges are met, the review concludes, HVBSCs could transform an industrial by-product into a mainstream, low-carbon building material, cutting emissions while delivering durable infrastructure.

Journal Reference

Yue, Z., & Zhu, X. (2025). Microstructural insights and technical challenges of effectively adopting high-volume GGBS in blended cements for low-carbon construction. npj Materials Sustainability3(1). DOI: 10.1038/s44296-025-00070-y. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44296-025-00070-y

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Nidhi Dhull

Written by

Nidhi Dhull

Nidhi Dhull is a freelance scientific writer, editor, and reviewer with a PhD in Physics. Nidhi has an extensive research experience in material sciences. Her research has been mainly focused on biosensing applications of thin films. During her Ph.D., she developed a noninvasive immunosensor for cortisol hormone and a paper-based biosensor for E. coli bacteria. Her works have been published in reputed journals of publishers like Elsevier and Taylor & Francis. She has also made a significant contribution to some pending patents.  

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Dhull, Nidhi. (2025, August 13). New Review Finds Cement Could Go Low-Carbon — If We Get the Chemistry Right. AZoBuild. Retrieved on August 13, 2025 from https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=23871.

  • MLA

    Dhull, Nidhi. "New Review Finds Cement Could Go Low-Carbon — If We Get the Chemistry Right". AZoBuild. 13 August 2025. <https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=23871>.

  • Chicago

    Dhull, Nidhi. "New Review Finds Cement Could Go Low-Carbon — If We Get the Chemistry Right". AZoBuild. https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=23871. (accessed August 13, 2025).

  • Harvard

    Dhull, Nidhi. 2025. New Review Finds Cement Could Go Low-Carbon — If We Get the Chemistry Right. AZoBuild, viewed 13 August 2025, https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=23871.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.