Review of 95 Studies Highlights Gaps in Construction Safety Tech Adoption

A recent review article in Buildings analyzed 95 academic studies to understand how digital technologies are being used in construction safety management. Drawing from research in both developed and developing countries, the review identifies which technologies are most commonly applied, how they’re being used, and what’s limiting wider adoption, especially in lower-income regions.

Construction health and safety.

Image Credit: skipper_sr/Shutterstock.com

Purpose of the Review

The construction industry continues to face high accident rates globally. Digital technologies like virtual reality (VR), artificial intelligence (AI), drones, and wearables are often proposed as solutions, but until now, no single study had mapped out how these tools are actually being used in practice, or how adoption differs by region. This review fills that gap.

By examining studies indexed in the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases, the authors set out to identify:

  • The main technologies used in construction safety
  • The purposes they serve
  • Regional adoption patterns
  • Key barriers and enablers

Where and How Digital Technologies Are Being Used

In developed countries, DTs like VR, AI, and machine learning are commonly used in training, monitoring, and risk analysis. These tools are often integrated into existing workflows, supported by better infrastructure and access to skilled labor.

In developing countries, uptake is limited. Only a small number of studies reported consistent use of DTs in low-resource settings. According to the review, major barriers include lack of funding, limited access to technology, and shortages of trained personnel.

Across both contexts, some technologies—such as augmented reality (AR), wearable devices, and 4D simulations—have seen limited adoption overall. High costs and hardware challenges remain key obstacles.

In contrast, AI and VR are more widely used. VR’s familiarity through gaming and simulation has supported its adoption in safety training. AI is valued for its compatibility with existing systems, especially for tasks like data analysis and risk prediction.

How These Technologies Impact Safety

The review identifies five areas where digital technologies contribute to construction safety:

  1. Education and Training – VR is widely used to deliver immersive, interactive training environments. Some programs use VR for online safety training, which allows greater flexibility for workers.
  2. Proactive Risk Management – Digital tools support early identification of hazards. This allows teams to build safety planning into project timelines, rather than reacting to issues after they occur.
  3. Decision Support – AI enables safety managers to forecast risk levels and safety performance based on site data, improving the quality of safety decisions.
  4. Monitoring and Alerts – Automated systems powered by AI detect unsafe behavior and issue real-time alerts, helping reduce accidents through early intervention.
  5. Communication and Coordination – Digital platforms improve safety-related communication between workers, supervisors, and project managers, supporting better compliance.

Strategies for Broader Adoption

The review outlines several strategies that can help increase the use of digital technologies in construction safety:

  • Policy-level action: Government regulations and incentives can encourage adoption. For example, a mandate in Tennessee requires contractors on public projects to use digital construction tools, supported by financial incentives like grants and tax breaks.
  • Organizational support: Within companies, training programs, internal policies, and a supportive culture are important. The review notes that technical tools alone are not enough—organizational readiness matters.
  • Performance measurement: To track the impact of these tools, the review recommends using indicators like the total recordable incident rate or safety inspection scores. Drones and AI can assist in collecting and analyzing these metrics efficiently.

Limitations and Future Directions

The review focuses on studies published in English and sourced from Scopus and Web of Science, which means research from other databases or in other languages may be missing. As a result, some regional insights—particularly from underrepresented or non-English-speaking countries—may not be fully captured.

To address this, the authors recommend expanding future reviews to include a broader range of sources. They also highlight the importance of studying the long-term effects of digital technology adoption and identifying the specific factors—whether financial, infrastructural, or educational—that contribute to slower uptake in certain regions.

Journal Reference

Daniel, E. I., Oshodi, O. S., Nwankwo, N. I., Emuze, F. A., & Chinyio, E. (2025). The Use of Digital Technologies in Construction Safety: A Systematic Review. Buildings, 15(8), 1386. DOI: 10.3390/buildings15081386, https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/8/1386

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Nidhi Dhull

Written by

Nidhi Dhull

Nidhi Dhull is a freelance scientific writer, editor, and reviewer with a PhD in Physics. Nidhi has an extensive research experience in material sciences. Her research has been mainly focused on biosensing applications of thin films. During her Ph.D., she developed a noninvasive immunosensor for cortisol hormone and a paper-based biosensor for E. coli bacteria. Her works have been published in reputed journals of publishers like Elsevier and Taylor & Francis. She has also made a significant contribution to some pending patents.  

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Dhull, Nidhi. (2025, May 01). Review of 95 Studies Highlights Gaps in Construction Safety Tech Adoption. AZoBuild. Retrieved on May 01, 2025 from https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=23784.

  • MLA

    Dhull, Nidhi. "Review of 95 Studies Highlights Gaps in Construction Safety Tech Adoption". AZoBuild. 01 May 2025. <https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=23784>.

  • Chicago

    Dhull, Nidhi. "Review of 95 Studies Highlights Gaps in Construction Safety Tech Adoption". AZoBuild. https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=23784. (accessed May 01, 2025).

  • Harvard

    Dhull, Nidhi. 2025. Review of 95 Studies Highlights Gaps in Construction Safety Tech Adoption. AZoBuild, viewed 01 May 2025, https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=23784.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.