The global cladding industry has undergone major shifts in the wake of high-profile tragedies like the 2017 Grenfell Tower fire, which exposed deep flaws in building safety practices. Since then, regulations worldwide have moved away from rigid, prescriptive models toward more flexible, risk-based frameworks that address both fire safety and sustainability.
Image Credit: Tricky_Shark/Shutterstock.com
Fast forward to today, and the cladding industry finds itself navigating a more complex—but ultimately more thoughtful—regulatory landscape.
This article takes a closer look at how cladding regulations have evolved, the material innovations driving compliance, and what’s on the horizon for building envelopes. Today’s regulatory landscape sits at the intersection of safety, environmental responsibility, and technology, and it continues to evolve in response to emerging challenges and international best practices.
Download your PDF copy now!
Grenfell wasn’t just a UK issue—it sparked international scrutiny. Regulators worldwide began rethinking their fire safety standards, especially around high-rise buildings and exterior wall systems. In the UK, this has led to some of the most comprehensive reforms in decades.
Before Grenfell, many building codes followed a checkbox mentality. But that approach proved inadequate in real-world fire scenarios, especially in complex high-rise structures. Now, many jurisdictions, especially in the UK and across Europe, are adopting performance-based frameworks. These don’t just ask what’s used in construction, but how it performs when things go wrong.
Regulatory Changes: What’s Actually Different?
The UK’s Combustibility Ban: Expanded and Enforced
Shortly after Grenfell, the UK government introduced a ban on combustible materials in the external walls of residential buildings over 18 meters. In 2022, that threshold was lowered to 11 meters, expanding the scope to include mid-rise buildings. Why the change? Evacuation times in fires vary dramatically, especially for vulnerable residents, and height alone doesn’t always determine risk.
The legislation specifically bans MCM with unmodified polyethylene cores (MCM-PE), which are one of the major contributors to Grenfell’s rapid fire spread. This ban now influences both new construction and retrofit projects, though enforcement and guidance differ depending on building use and type.1
System-Level Safety Requirements
Safety requirements now go beyond material choice. For example, any new residential building over 11 meters must include secure information boxes—a centralized source of critical building data for emergency responders. At 18 meters and above, evacuation alert systems are required to help fire services carry out phased evacuations.
This reflects a strategic shift: it's no longer enough to simply prohibit dangerous products. Regulations are now about improving how buildings function under pressure.1
Accountability Has a Longer Tail Now
The Building Safety Act (2022) introduced a game-changing 15-year retrospective liability period for construction defects. Developers and contractors are now legally exposed for decisions made well over a decade ago. This has reshaped how projects are scoped, priced, and risk-assessed.
The Act also established the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) and defined clear roles for dutyholders at every stage of the building lifecycle. This includes design, construction, and ongoing maintenance—recognizing that safety doesn’t end when construction does.2
And it’s not just about new builds. The UK’s Remediation Acceleration Plan mandates that high-risk buildings with unsafe cladding must be remediated by 2029, with strict consequences for non-compliance.3
Testing isn’t Just Lab-Based Anymore—It’s System-Wide
Regulatory bodies have largely moved away from testing individual components in isolation. Instead, full cladding assemblies—including substructures, fixings, and insulation—must now undergo large-scale fire testing to simulate real-world performance.
The Role of BS 8414 and Beyond
In the UK, the go-to test is BS 8414, which measures vertical fire spread across multi-story setups. Unlike smaller, component-level tests, this standard is designed to account for how materials interact under stress. Recent additions also require horizontal fire testing for balconies, recognizing their different fire dynamics.
Other countries are updating standards, too. South Korea now mandates non-combustible mineral wool EIFS (External Insulation Finishing Systems) in high-rises over 30 stories. It also requires fire breaks every three floors—a simple yet effective way to interrupt vertical fire progression.1,4
Practical Flexibility: Not Everything is Black-and-White
Despite stricter rules, regulators are building in nuance. For instance, in the UK, fiber optic cables and insulation layers under 300mm are exempt from the combustibility ban, based on their limited contribution to fire load. Similarly, a temporary 18-month exemption was granted for cavity trays, recognizing real-world supply chain constraints while maintaining a risk-based lens.1
These kinds of decisions highlight a more data-driven and contextual regulatory approach.
Global Regulation: Aligning… Slowly
While Europe’s EN 13501 system is becoming a de facto benchmark for fire classifications, testing and compliance pathways still vary widely around the world.
- In the US, the ASTM E84 and NFPA 285 standards dominate, but application varies by state, making it harder for global manufacturers to achieve universal compliance.4
- China’s GB 8624 integrates elements of both European and US methods and adds specific requirements for high-rises, including floor-by-floor fire barriers.4
The shift towards performance-based compliance marks a significant regulatory change. Instead of specifying materials, frameworks set performance benchmarks that can be achieved with various design solutions. This approach fosters innovation while ensuring safety. Designers can create tailored solutions that suit specific building types, heights, and uses, focusing on how buildings perform during fire emergencies.1
Material Innovation and Compliance Strategies
The move toward non-combustible materials has spurred innovation in cladding technologies. Manufacturers are developing solutions that balance fire safety, sustainability, and aesthetics. The most notable advancements are in ceramic, metal, and composite materials, each designed for different building needs and regulatory contexts.
Mineral-Based Materials
Materials like terracotta and fiber cement are gaining ground due to their fire safety, weather resistance, and recyclability. Terracotta cladding systems now include advanced fixing mechanisms that improve structural integrity and installation efficiency. Meanwhile, fiber cement’s strength and low combustibility make it a go-to for mid- and high-rise projects.5
Metal Technologies
Aluminum remains a favorite in façade design for its lightweight structure and design flexibility. But the shift now is toward mineral-filled fire-retardant cores that meet stringent safety requirements.
Material selection is also more deliberate:
- 6063 aluminum is often used for parts that need anodizing and structural performance.
- The 5000 series, valued for its corrosion resistance, is often found in ventilated screen systems where durability under weathering is critical.5
Advanced Composites
Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) and Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) offer lightweight alternatives with design flexibility and inherent fire resistance. These materials can be molded into complex geometries while maintaining structural integrity under high temperatures, making them suitable for innovative architectural expressions where both form and safety are priorities.
High-Pressure Laminates (HPL) have also evolved with fire-retardant resin systems, though their use remains restricted in higher-risk buildings despite improved performance characteristics.5
How Software is Reshaping Cladding Design and Compliance
As materials evolve to meet stricter fire safety standards, so too must the tools used to design and verify them. Software now plays a central role in ensuring that cladding systems don’t just look good on paper, but that they hold up under regulatory scrutiny and real-world performance demands.
It starts with Building Information Modeling (BIM). Tools like Revit and ArchiCAD allow teams to model cladding systems in detail, incorporating fire ratings, fixings, insulation, and substructure into a coordinated digital environment. These models help catch compliance issues early, streamline cross-discipline collaboration, and maintain a clear audit trail as designs develop.
For assemblies that fall outside standard guidance, or where a performance-based approach is required, fire modeling software adds another layer of analysis. Programs such as FDS, PyroSim, and Pathfinder simulate how façades respond to fire, how flames spread, and how occupants evacuate. These tools are especially valuable for high-rise buildings, bespoke cladding systems, or retrofit scenarios where prescriptive testing may not fully apply.
Even material selection has gone digital. Verified product libraries like NBS Source and manufacturer BIM platforms give designers access to tested systems, classification data, and certification documents. This reduces ambiguity during specification and simplifies compliance reviews, especially as regulations shift toward full-assembly performance over component-level approval.
During construction, digital platforms help ensure that design intent is carried through on-site. Tools like PlanRadar, Zutec, and Bolster are used to track cladding installation, document remedial work, and log decisions tied to safety-critical elements. For buildings under regulatory oversight, these records aren’t just helpful—they’re often required for sign-off or future inspections.
Together, these software tools form the connective tissue between design, regulation, and delivery. They don’t replace good design or sound materials, but they make it possible to manage risk, prove compliance, and build façades that meet today’s far more demanding expectations.
Conclusion
Cladding standards worldwide have changed dramatically in recent years, driven by high-rise fires that exposed serious flaws in how façades are designed, tested, and regulated. And while progress hasn’t been perfect, the shift toward performance-based compliance, system-wide fire testing, and transparent accountability is a step in the right direction.
Material science and regulation will continue to evolve in tandem. As cladding technologies improve, so will the standards that govern them. For architects, contractors, and developers alike, staying informed isn’t just a box to check—it’s essential for designing buildings that are safe, efficient, and future-ready.
Looking to Stay Ahead of the Curve?
Here are a few areas worth exploring next:
Download your PDF copy now!
References and Further Reading
- Change in rules for use of cladding on medium-rise buildings. (2022). The Fire Protection Association. https://www.thefpa.co.uk/news/change-in-rules-for-use-of-cladding-on-medium-rise-buildings
- A look ahead at building safety for the construction industry in 2025. (2025). Shoosmiths | For What Matters. https://www.shoosmiths.com/insights/articles/a-look-ahead-at-building-safety-for-the-construction-industry-in-2025
- Gower, A. et al. (2025). Regulations: what lies ahead in 2025? Project Safety Journal. https://projectsafetyjournal.com/regulations-what-lies-ahead-in-2025/
- Kim, M. et al. (2021). Improvement of standards on fire safety performance of externally insulated high-rise buildings: Focusing on the case in Korea. Journal of Building Engineering, 35, 101990. DOI:10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101990. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352710220336226
- Exploring Trends, Materials, and Benefits of Building Cladding. (2024). WFM Media. https://wfmmedia.com/exterior-wall-cladding-materials-trends-designs-norms-and-regulations/
Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.