Sustainable building materials are becoming a necessity as the construction industry faces growing pressure to reduce its environmental impact. With buildings responsible for a large share of global carbon emissions, finding smarter ways to build is more important than ever.
Image Credit: dee karen/Shutterstock.com
That’s where material choices come in. From renewable resources to low-carbon alternatives, today’s sustainable options can significantly cut the embodied energy of a project while supporting healthier, longer-lasting spaces. Whether it’s for a residential build or a commercial development, using the right materials can make a real difference.
In this article, we’re breaking down ten of the most impactful sustainable building materials, looking at what they are, how they’re used, and why they matter in modern construction.
Want all the details? Download the full free PDF guide.
1. Bamboo
Among natural building materials, bamboo stands out for its combination of speed, strength, and renewability. It reaches maturity in as little as three to five years—much faster than conventional timber—and regrows from the same root system, minimizing the need for replanting and reducing soil disturbance.
In construction, bamboo is valued for its strength-to-weight ratio and flexibility, particularly in seismic zones. It’s used in flooring, panelling, and occasionally in structural applications, especially in regions where it’s locally sourced. Because the entire plant can be utilized, waste is minimal, and its compostability supports end-of-life circularity.
For designers aiming to reduce embodied carbon without sacrificing aesthetic or performance, bamboo offers a material that’s both ecologically sound and technically viable.1
2. Mass Timber
For projects requiring larger structural spans or vertical scale, mass timber offers a low-carbon alternative to steel and concrete. Products like cross-laminated timber (CLT), glue-laminated timber (GLT), and laminated veneer lumber (LVL) enable wood to be used in mid- and high-rise buildings—now permitted up to 18 storeys under many building codes.
Mass timber retains carbon captured during tree growth and requires significantly less energy to manufacture than mineral- or metal-based systems. Its off-site prefabrication reduces waste and shortens construction timelines, while also supporting improved quality control and worker safety.
Architects and engineers are increasingly turning to mass timber for projects that require structural efficiency, reduced emissions, and a warm, natural material palette. In many ways, it represents a bridge between traditional craftsmanship and modern performance demands.2
3. Hempcrete
If mass timber addresses structure, hempcrete offers a complementary solution for high-performance wall assemblies. Made from hemp hurd and a lime-based binder, hempcrete functions as a lightweight, non-load-bearing infill material that provides excellent thermal insulation, vapor permeability, and moisture buffering.
What sets hempcrete apart is its carbon-negative lifecycle: hemp absorbs more CO2 during growth than is released during processing and installation. This makes it an attractive option for projects targeting net-zero or low-embodied-carbon benchmarks.
With strong fire resistance, good acoustic performance, and low toxicity, hempcrete is gaining traction in residential and low-rise applications. As pre-mixed systems and code approvals continue to expand, it’s becoming more accessible for teams working with natural or regenerative design frameworks.3
4. Limestone–Calcined Clay Cement (LC3)
While bio-based materials offer strong benefits in early-stage design, decarbonizing cement remains one of the biggest challenges in construction. LC3 (Limestone–Calcined Clay Cement) is a promising alternative that significantly reduces embodied emissions—by up to 40 %—without requiring changes to existing production infrastructure.
By replacing a large portion of clinker with calcined clay and limestone, LC3 maintains a strength and durability comparable to that of Portland cement while reducing the energy intensity of production. It’s particularly valuable in markets where fly ash or slag are limited but clay and limestone are abundant.
LC3’s compatibility with conventional kilns and mix designs makes it highly scalable (an important factor as emissions targets tighten and embodied carbon is scrutinized across more project phases). It offers a path forward for concrete-intensive projects that need measurable carbon reductions without compromising performance or cost-efficiency.4
5. CO2-Mineralized Concrete
Concrete’s ubiquity makes it a priority for decarbonization. CO2-mineralized concrete addresses this by capturing and permanently storing carbon during the production phase. The process involves injecting CO2 into fresh concrete, where it reacts with calcium ions to form solid calcium carbonates, enhancing compressive strength while reducing the material’s net carbon footprint.
This technology doesn’t dramatically alter traditional mix designs, making it relatively easy to integrate into existing production workflows. It’s already being used in precast elements, paving, and structural slabs, especially in regions where carbon regulations are tightening or embodied carbon disclosures are required.
As more projects pursue Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) and full lifecycle assessments, CO2-mineralized concrete offers a data-backed path to emission reductions without sacrificing structural performance or durability.5
6. Mycelium
While most sustainable materials aim to reduce environmental harm, mycelium (a fungal root network) goes a step further by requiring minimal energy to produce and fully biodegrading at the end of its use cycle. Grown in controlled conditions using agricultural waste as feedstock, mycelium-based materials are emerging as viable options for interior insulation, acoustic panels, and non-load-bearing components.
Its thermal and acoustic performance make it a strong candidate for interior fit-outs in projects targeting low-toxicity and cradle-to-grave certification. It’s naturally fire-resistant and emits no VOCs, contributing to healthier indoor environments.
Though structural applications are still under research, interest in mycelium is growing rapidly due to its circular potential, scalability, and ultra-low embodied carbon. As manufacturing methods become more standardized, it’s likely to see broader uptake in interior architecture and sustainable design systems.6
7. Rammed Earth
Rammed earth is a traditional building method that has reemerged in modern sustainable construction thanks to its extremely low embodied energy and use of site-sourced materials. It involves compacting layers of moistened earth, often stabilized with a small amount of cement or lime, into rigid, load-bearing walls.
This method eliminates the need for energy-intensive materials and offers high thermal mass, contributing to passive heating and cooling performance in appropriate climates. It also performs well in terms of durability and fire resistance when properly engineered.
Modern adaptations, such as improved formwork systems and controlled soil mix designs, have expanded rammed earth’s viability in both residential and commercial projects. When local soil conditions are suitable, it becomes a cost-effective, carbon-conscious option that connects architectural expression with regional identity.7
8. Cork
Cork is harvested from the bark of cork oak trees without harming the tree itself, making it one of the few building materials that is both rapidly renewable and non-destructive to its source. The bark regenerates over 9–12 years, allowing for multiple harvest cycles over the tree’s lifespan.
In construction, cork is used primarily for flooring, wall panels, and insulation, particularly in interiors where acoustic control and indoor air quality are priorities. It’s naturally antimicrobial, hypoallergenic, and highly resistant to moisture, mold, and fire—all without chemical treatments.
Cork’s low density, thermal insulation properties, and sound absorption make it an increasingly popular material in retrofits and high-performance building envelopes. Its lightweight nature also supports easier handling and installation, especially in prefabricated systems and modular assemblies.8
9. Recycled Steel
Steel remains a structural mainstay in commercial and industrial construction, but producing virgin steel is energy-intensive and emissions-heavy. Recycled steel addresses this by drastically lowering the embodied carbon footprint without compromising strength, durability, or code compliance.
The material is typically recovered from post-industrial and post-consumer sources and processed through electric arc furnaces, which use less energy than traditional blast furnace methods. Recycled steel can be reused repeatedly without degrading performance, making it ideal for closed-loop material strategies.
It’s commonly used in framing systems, structural reinforcements, roofing, and façade elements—particularly in large-scale or high-rise applications. When paired with responsible sourcing and EPD documentation, recycled steel contributes significantly to LEED, BREEAM, and other sustainability certifications.9
10. Geopolymer Concrete
Geopolymer concrete offers a cement-free alternative to conventional mixes by using industrial byproducts such as fly ash, slag, or calcined clay activated by alkaline solutions. The result is a binder that performs similarly to Portland cement in terms of compressive strength but with a significantly lower carbon footprint.
Geopolymer mixes are especially well-suited for applications where chemical resistance and fire durability are critical, such as marine infrastructure, industrial floors, and tunnel linings. They also show promise in precast systems where controlled conditions can optimize curing and mix performance.
Successful use of geopolymer concrete depends on careful material characterization and alkali handling, but when specified correctly, it provides a resilient, low-emission alternative for projects targeting high-performance and low-impact outcomes.10
Material Selection and Project Integration
As the range of sustainable materials continues to expand, effective selection depends not only on environmental credentials but also on how well a material fits the demands of a specific project. The materials highlighted above illustrate the breadth of available solutions, from biogenic insulation to low-carbon concrete alternatives, but choosing the right product requires balancing multiple performance criteria.
Factors such as durability, availability, toxicity, and end-of-life treatment all influence material suitability. Beyond carbon footprint, design teams must consider how each material contributes to both the operational performance and the embodied impact of a building over its lifecycle.
Certification frameworks such as LEED, BREEAM, and WELL help formalize this process, providing structured tools like Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs), Health Product Declarations (HPDs), and life cycle assessments (LCAs) to support evidence-based material choices. Increasingly, these frameworks are shaping procurement standards, planning approvals, and client expectations.
Successful integration also hinges on context. Locally sourced materials such as rammed earth or bamboo may offer environmental and cultural benefits in regional projects, while engineered systems like LC3 cement or recycled steel may be better suited to high-density urban developments or infrastructure work. Aligning material performance with project intent is critical for realizing long-term sustainability outcomes.
Conclusion
The pressure to reduce embodied carbon is real, but so is the opportunity to build better. Materials aren’t just inputs; they shape how buildings perform, how they age, and how they respond to the environment. And in a profession that’s always balancing design, cost, and risk, those choices matter.
There’s no universal solution. Every project brings its own constraints, but we now have the tools and materials to make more informed decisions, and we’re past the point where default specs are good enough. What’s needed is earlier conversations, better data, and a willingness to work with materials that reflect the future of the industry, not the past.
This isn’t about chasing trends. It’s about being more intentional with what we use and using it well.
Want all the details? Grab your free PDF now!
References and Further Reading
- Sharma, B. et al. (2015). Engineered bamboo for structural applications. [online] Construction and Building Materials. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061815001117
- Espinoza, O. et al. (2016). Cross-laminated timber: Status and research needs in Europe. [online] BioRes. Available at: https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/resources/cross-laminated-timber-status-and-research-needs-in-europe/
- T. Wei et al. (2025). State of the Art Review on Hempcrete as a Sustainable Substitute for Traditional Construction Materials for Home Building. [online] Buildings. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/12/1988
- Barbhuiya, S., et al. (2023). Properties, compatibility, environmental benefits and future directions of limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) concrete: A Review. [online] Journal of Building Engineering. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352710223019745.
- Guteta, L.E. et al. (2025) Producing sustainable construction materials through carbon mineralization. [online] Airfield and Highway Pavements. Available at: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/9780784486221.009.
- Voutetaki, M.E. and Mpalaskas, A.C. (2024). Natural fiber-reinforced mycelium composite for innovative and sustainable construction materials. [online] Fibers. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6439/12/7/57.
- Ciancio, D & Beckett, C. (2013). Rammed earth: An overview of a sustainable construction material. [online] Proceedings of the 3rd Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies Conference. Available at: http://www.claisse.info/2013%20papers/data/e053.pdf
- Yadav, M., Singhal, I. (2024). Sustainable construction: the use of cork material in the building industry. [online] Mater Renew Sustain Energy. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40243-024-00270-x
- Bassam A. Burgan, Michael R. Sansom. (2006). Sustainable steel construction. [online] Journal of Constructional Steel Research. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0143974X06001416
- Alhazmi, H., Shah, S. A. R., & Mahmood, A. (2020). Sustainable Development of Innovative Green Construction Materials: A Study for Economical Eco-Friendly Recycled Aggregate Based Geopolymer Concrete. [online] Materials. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/21/4881
Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.