Concrete Carbon Accounting Uses Isotope Fingerprints

Carbon accounting improves as isotope measurements distinguish fossil-derived CO2 from atmospheric uptake in cementitious materials, helping verify concrete sequestration claims for emissions reporting, carbon trading, and low-carbon construction systems today.

Study: Quantification of sequestered fossil-derived CO2 in cementitious materials and its atmospheric contamination using carbon isotope measurements. Image Credit: Nuttapon Pohnprompratahn/Shutterstock

In a recent research article published in the journal Cement and Concrete Research, researchers developed a novel isotope ratio measurement technique to accurately distinguish and quantify carbon dioxide absorbed by concrete from natural versus industrial sources, improving carbon accounting methods.

Carbon Isotope Challenges

Concrete production is a major contributor to global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, accounting for a significant portion of the greenhouse gases driving climate change. In response to pressures for sustainability in the construction industry, researchers have explored methods to enable concrete to absorb CO2 rather than simply emit it.

One promising avenue involves special concrete production techniques designed to sequester carbon dioxide by incorporating it into the concrete material itself during manufacturing. However, a critical uncertainty that persisted was the precise source of the absorbed CO2, whether it originated from atmospheric air or from industrial exhaust gases.

Differentiating these sources is essential for accurate carbon accounting and effective carbon trading, as emissions from industrial sources carry higher regulatory and economic implications than those from natural background emissions. Before this study, the difficulty lay in quantifying how much CO2 absorbed by concrete was derived from industrial emissions versus atmospheric sources.

Isotope Ratio Analysis

The study employed Ordinary Portland cement pastes prepared with a water-to-cement mass ratio of 0.55. The cement was hydrated for over 2.5 years in saturated lime water to ensure full hydration, then crushed and ground under a nitrogen atmosphere to avoid atmospheric CO2 contamination before experiments. The powder samples were sieved under 90 μm and freeze-dried to achieve stability before carbonation.

Carbonation was conducted under controlled relative humidity conditions, specifically 33%, 60%, and 95% RH, maintained using saturated salt solutions inside sealed desiccators. A CO2-free atmosphere was maintained using air passed through a CO2 adsorbent and electromagnetically pumped, ensuring that only designated fossil-based CO2 (from a ¹4C-free cylinder) was introduced for the accelerated carbonation experiments.

Two types of carbonation experiments were performed: accelerated carbonation using fossil-derived CO24C-free) under controlled humidity and natural carbonation involving exposure to atmospheric CO2 containing natural ¹4C. Sequential mass measurements ensured equilibrium of water content inside the powders before carbonation at each RH level.

Following carbonation, the total carbon content fixed in the samples was quantified by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and total inorganic carbon (TIC) measurements to ascertain CO2 uptake. Carbon isotopes were analyzed using isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) for δ¹³C and accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) for ¹4C content expressed in pMC (percent modern carbon) units.

Download the PDF of this page here

Two approaches were developed to estimate the fraction of atmospheric CO2 uptake, defined as contamination. The fractionation-based method corrected for isotopic fractionation effects during carbonation reactions using measured δ¹³C and ¹4C data, facilitating mass balances of isotopes between initial carbon, supplied fossil CO2, and atmospheric CO2.

Source Differentiation Insights

The carbonation experiments verified that relative humidity substantially influences CO2 uptake in cementitious powders. Carbon fixation was highest near intermediate to high humidity (60–95% RH), consistent with the literature pointing to a balance between sufficient moisture for CO2 dissolution and adequate diffusion pathways within pores. At low humidity (33% RH), limited pore water availability restricted carbonation rates.

An important observation was the measurable incorporation of atmospheric CO2 into the carbonated samples during accelerated carbonation, despite the supply of ¹4C-free fossil CO2. This atmospheric contamination arose because the sealed incubation environment still contained residual atmospheric CO2 with a high ¹4C signature, which mixed with the supplied gas, influencing the isotopic composition of fixed carbon.

Model comparisons based on measured vs. estimated radiocarbon content showed good agreement for natural carbonation samples but systematic deviations for accelerated carbonation, reinforcing the occurrence of atmospheric CO2 mixing under artificial conditions.

The two proposed methods for quantifying atmospheric contamination yielded comparable results. The fractionation-based approach accounted explicitly for isotope fractionation during carbonation, with fractionation factors for ¹³C and ¹4C derived and applied.

The simpler radiocarbon-based estimation used weighted averages of radiocarbon signatures to calculate contamination fractions. Both approaches confirmed that even minor atmospheric CO2 presence can noticeably skew radiocarbon measurements due to the high ¹4C content in atmospheric CO2 versus fossil CO2.

Enhanced Carbon Accounting

This research provides a pioneering methodology that enhances the precision of carbon accounting related to concrete production by quantifying the origins of CO2 sequestered within cementitious materials.

These findings have significant implications for the construction industry’s role in carbon management, enabling more transparent and verifiable carbon trading mechanisms and environmental reporting. The ability to identify and measure the uptake of fossil-derived CO2 in special concrete formulations supports the development of carbon-neutral or even carbon-negative building materials, which is essential for achieving broader climate targets.

This work marks a substantial step toward integrating advanced scientific techniques into sustainable building practices, fostering innovation in low-carbon construction materials that can mitigate the environmental footprint of the built environment.

Journal Reference

Maruyama I., Igami R., et al. (2026). Quantification of sequestered fossil-derived CO2 in cementitious materials and its atmospheric contamination using carbon isotope measurements. Cement and Concrete Research 207:108290. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2026.108290, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008884626001602

Dr. Noopur Jain

Written by

Dr. Noopur Jain

Dr. Noopur Jain is an accomplished Scientific Writer based in the city of New Delhi, India. With a Ph.D. in Materials Science, she brings a depth of knowledge and experience in electron microscopy, catalysis, and soft materials. Her scientific publishing record is a testament to her dedication and expertise in the field. Additionally, she has hands-on experience in the field of chemical formulations, microscopy technique development and statistical analysis.    

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Jain, Noopur. (2026, June 15). Concrete Carbon Accounting Uses Isotope Fingerprints. AZoBuild. Retrieved on June 16, 2026 from https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=24097.

  • MLA

    Jain, Noopur. "Concrete Carbon Accounting Uses Isotope Fingerprints". AZoBuild. 16 June 2026. <https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=24097>.

  • Chicago

    Jain, Noopur. "Concrete Carbon Accounting Uses Isotope Fingerprints". AZoBuild. https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=24097. (accessed June 16, 2026).

  • Harvard

    Jain, Noopur. 2026. Concrete Carbon Accounting Uses Isotope Fingerprints. AZoBuild, viewed 16 June 2026, https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=24097.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.