Lunar and Martian Regolith Simulants Tested for Space Construction

Lunar and Martian regolith simulants have been analyzed to assess their cementitious potential. Though the simulants exhibited little cementitious reactivity under tested conditions, they did show potential as inert fillers. These findings, published in npj Space Exploration, provide important guidance for future development of construction materials based on in situ resources for future Martian and lunar habitats.

The Earth as seen from the surface of the Moon. Rocky Moon surface with multiple craters
Study: Assessing the cementitious reactivity of lunar and Martian regolith simulants for extraterrestrial construction. Image Credit: muratart/Shutterstock.com

Understanding the Construction Potential of Planetary Regolith

Building permanent infrastructure on the Moon and Mars will require construction materials that are available on-site, as transporting cement from Earth is prohibitively expensive and impractical for large-scale construction. As a result, researchers are exploring ways to use planetary regolith as a local building material.

Regolith is the loose layer of rock fragments and mineral particles covering the Moon and Mars. Researchers have explored its use in geopolymers, concrete, and other cement-based materials, but its role in cement-based systems remains unclear.

Saving this for later? Download a free PDF copy now.

Existing studies have not established whether regolith actively participates in cement hydration or simply functions as an inert filler. This uncertainty affects binder selection, material processing, and construction strategies for future space missions. A reactive regolith could reduce the amount of binder that must be produced or transported from Earth.

In this study, the researchers evaluated six different widely studied lunar and Martian regolith simulants to determine their cementitious potential. They also explored whether thermal activation and mechanical grinding could improve their performance.

Finally, they assessed hydration behavior and compressive strength after incorporating the simulants into ordinary Portland cement (OPC). The study provides valuable guidance for designing future construction materials based on in situ resources.

Evaluating Regolith Using Multiple Reactivity Tests

The researchers selected six commercially available regolith simulants representing two lunar environments and four Martian geological settings. The lunar simulants represented highland and mare regions, while the Martian materials represented basaltic surfaces, hydrated clay deposits, polyhydrated sulfate deposits, and sediments from Jezero Crater.

They evaluated each simulant in its untreated state and after thermal activation and mechanical milling, creating 18 different material conditions for comparison.

The team employed various characterization techniques to assess cementitious and pozzolanic reactivity. Isothermal calorimetry measured the heat released during hydration in water and potassium hydroxide solutions, providing evidence of hydraulic activity.

The researchers also performed particle-size analysis, thermogravimetric analysis, and chemical characterization to determine how thermal and mechanical processing influenced the material properties.

The researchers then prepared blended cement mixtures by replacing part of the OPC with untreated, burned, or milled regolith simulants. They monitored hydration kinetics using calorimetry and measured compressive strength after 28 days of curing.

By combining hydration and mechanical data, they determined whether the simulants actively contributed to strength development or primarily functioned as inert fillers within the cement matrix.

Limited Cementitious Activity Shapes the Role of Regolith

The study showed that all untreated lunar and Martian regolith simulants had very limited cementitious reactivity.

Heat released during hydration remained well below the levels expected for hydraulic or pozzolanic materials. Electrical conductivity tests also confirmed that the lunar simulants did not react with calcium hydroxide as conventional supplementary cementitious materials do.

Together, these results show that the tested regoliths do not actively participate in cement hydration under the conditions investigated.

The researchers then examined whether thermal activation or mechanical milling could improve reactivity. Both treatments produced small increases in cumulative heat release, particularly after milling.

However, the improvements remained far below the accepted threshold for reactive supplementary cementitious materials. These findings indicate that moderate heating below 1000 °C and short-duration milling do not significantly improve the cementitious behavior of the tested simulants.

Although the simulants showed little chemical reactivity, they still performed well as fillers in cement-based systems. The blended mixtures followed hydration patterns similar to OPC, indicating that the regolith did not disrupt cement hydration. Compressive strengths ranged from 11.2 to 29.8 MPa, depending on the simulant and processing method.

The researchers also highlighted important limitations, such as the fact that Earth-based simulants cannot fully reproduce the mineralogy, radiation history, and surface chemistry of actual lunar and Martian regolith.

In addition, the experiments were conducted under terrestrial laboratory conditions rather than the vacuum, reduced gravity, radiation exposure, and extreme temperature fluctuations found on planetary surfaces. These factors could influence the behavior of actual regolith and the researchers suggest this should be investigated in future studies.

Supporting Future Construction Beyond Earth

This study provides one of the most comprehensive evaluations of the cementitious behavior of lunar and Martian regolith simulants. The findings show that these materials function primarily as inert fillers rather than reactive binders under the conditions investigated.

Under the examined conditions, untreated regolith could not serve as a direct replacement for cement. However, it can still contribute to construction materials as a locally available filler. These insights will help engineers design more practical construction systems based on in situ resource use.

The study also identifies several opportunities for future research. Researchers should also evaluate tensile strength, shear resistance, fatigue behavior, and performance under repeated loading caused by moonquakes and Marsquakes.

Testing under reduced pressure, radiation exposure, and extreme thermal cycling will further improve understanding of how these materials perform in extraterrestrial environments.

Overall, the study establishes an important foundation for future space construction. It elucidates the role of untreated regolith in cement-based materials while identifying the processing strategies needed to improve its performance.

As in situ resource utilization technologies continue to advance, these findings may help support the development of durable, resource-efficient infrastructure for sustained human exploration of the Moon and Mars.

Journal Reference

Leon-Miquel, M., Byers, B. S., & Jin, Q. (2026). Assessing the cementitious reactivity of lunar and Martian regolith simulants for extraterrestrial construction. npj Space Exploration. 2(29). https://www.nature.com/articles/s44453-026-00047-8.

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Akshatha Chandrashekar

Written by

Akshatha Chandrashekar

Dr. Akshatha Chandrashekar is a scientific writer and materials science researcher based in Bengaluru, India. She completed her PhD in Chemistry in 2025 at Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, and has a BSc from Mount Carmel College and an MSc in Analytical Chemistry. Akshatha’s doctoral research focused on multifunctional, thermally conductive silicone–carbon hybrid nanocomposites for advanced electronic applications. Her expertise spans nanocomposites, polymers, wastewater management, and thermal management systems. As a Junior and Senior Research Fellow on a DRDO-funded project, she helped develop elastomeric composites for wearable cooling garments, improving material performance and supporting successful technology transfer for defense applications. Akshatha has authored peer-reviewed journal articles, contributed to book chapters, and presented at national and international conferences. Her achievements include the Best Poster Award at APA Nanoforum 2022, the Best Student Paper Award at the 13th National Women Science Congress in 2021, and the Best Dissertation Award for her Master’s research. She was also a finalist in the “Spin Your Science” contest at the India Science Festival 2024, with her work archived in the Lunar Codex Project.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Chandrashekar, Akshatha. (2026, July 20). Lunar and Martian Regolith Simulants Tested for Space Construction. AZoBuild. Retrieved on July 20, 2026 from https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=24116.

  • MLA

    Chandrashekar, Akshatha. "Lunar and Martian Regolith Simulants Tested for Space Construction". AZoBuild. 20 July 2026. <https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=24116>.

  • Chicago

    Chandrashekar, Akshatha. "Lunar and Martian Regolith Simulants Tested for Space Construction". AZoBuild. https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=24116. (accessed July 20, 2026).

  • Harvard

    Chandrashekar, Akshatha. 2026. Lunar and Martian Regolith Simulants Tested for Space Construction. AZoBuild, viewed 20 July 2026, https://www.azobuild.com/news.aspx?newsID=24116.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.