Engineered for strength, redesigned with sustainability in mind. Researchers are examining how next-generation concrete mixes could drive a lower-carbon future in construction.
Study: Recent advances in low-carbon ultra-high-performance concrete: materials, mechanisms, and sustainability perspectives. Image Credit: afjahiza/Shutterstock.com
A recent review published in npj | Materials Sustainability brings together the latest research on low-carbon ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC), with a focus on material design, performance, and environmental impact. Rather than presenting new experimental data, the authors analyzed findings across the field to assess how UHPC can meet modern structural demands while cutting carbon emissions (an urgent need given the construction sector’s significant environmental footprint).
What Sets UHPC Apart?
UHPC is known for its exceptional mechanical performance. Compressive strengths typically exceed 120–150 MPa, and tensile strengths range from 5–10 MPa. This is achieved through carefully engineered mixes that include fine aggregates, high cement content, and supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) such as silica fume, ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), fly ash, metakaolin, and calcined clays.
But this high performance comes with a trade-off.
Traditional UHPC production relies heavily on cement, which alone contributes about 7–8 % of global CO2 emissions. That’s where the push for low-carbon alternatives comes in.
Recent efforts have focused on rethinking the UHPC formula.
By integrating alternative SCMs and more sustainable practices, researchers aim to maintain the material’s strength and durability while reducing its environmental cost. Its dense microstructure also enhances resistance to weathering and chemical attack, extending service life and reducing maintenance. And because of its strength, structures can be built with thinner sections - cutting down on raw materials and overall emissions.
Reviewing the Research Landscape
In this review, researchers set out to identify viable alternatives to traditional UHPC components. They examined a wide range of SCMs - both industrial by-products like fly ash and GGBFS, and naturally occurring materials such as metakaolin and calcined clays.
While the study itself didn’t introduce new lab results, it brought together findings from existing research, including mechanical tests (like compressive and flexural strength), microstructural analysis (via scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction), and evaluations of hydration processes.
Durability was another focus.
The authors reviewed data from studies measuring permeability and chemical resistance, key indicators of long-term performance. They also looked at life-cycle assessments (LCAs) to compare environmental impacts between conventional and low-carbon UHPC mixes. In addition, computational models were included to assess long-term behavior and estimate carbon savings, which is critical for predicting real-world outcomes.
What the Data Reveals
The synthesis revealed promising results.
SCMs such as metakaolin, GGBFS, fly ash, and even recycled glass powder helped maintain or improve mechanical performance while reducing embodied carbon by up to 30 %. In some cases, low-carbon formulations even surpassed the strength of conventional UHPC.
These performance gains came down to a few key factors: particle size distribution, reactivity, and the degree of hydration. Finer particles improved packing density and reduced porosity, while reactive materials like metakaolin enhanced pozzolanic activity and matrix densification. Mixes incorporating up to 30 % GGBFS showed notable long-term strength due to ongoing hydration processes.
Equally important, the review reinforced the value of industrial by-products as effective SCMs, supporting both carbon reduction and waste reuse. Some studies also explored innovative curing techniques, such as CO2 curing, which not only boosted strength but enabled carbon sequestration during the curing process itself.
Still, the authors caution that performance isn’t guaranteed across all scenarios.
Some SCMs with high surface areas can increase water demand, potentially affecting workability. The chemical makeup, amorphous content, and activation method of each material play a critical role in determining how well it contributes to strength and durability. To guide formulation choices, the review categorized SCMs based on their pozzolanic, latent hydraulic, or inert behavior.
Construction-Ready Applications
The implications for real-world construction are quite significant. Low-carbon UHPC’s strength and durability make it ideal for infrastructure where performance matters most (think bridges, high-rises, precast elements, and marine structures, all of which benefit from long service life and corrosion resistance).
Beyond structural performance, the integration of recycled materials helps address industrial waste challenges. By turning by-products into functional components of UHPC, the industry supports circular economy practices while reducing its environmental footprint.
However, the review also flagged practical hurdles. The availability of SCMs varies regionally, and inconsistent methods for calculating embodied carbon make it difficult to compare environmental claims across studies. These challenges underscore the need for more standardized approaches.
Where the Research Should Go Next
Taken together, these insights suggest that low-carbon UHPC is a viable pathway toward more sustainable construction. But realizing its full potential will require continued innovation.
The authors point to several priorities for future work: refining mix designs, identifying new low-carbon materials, and improving curing techniques to boost both performance and environmental outcomes. Just as crucial is the development of standardized testing methods and performance benchmarks, which would help facilitate broader adoption across the industry.
By building on these strategies, the construction sector can move closer to its sustainability targets without compromising the strength, durability, or longevity that modern infrastructure demands.
Journal Reference
Hiew, S.Y., & et al. (2026). Recent advances in low-carbon ultra-high-performance concrete: materials, mechanisms, and sustainability perspectives. npj Mater. Sustain. 4, 3. DOI: 10.1038/s44296-025-00093-5, https://www.nature.com/articles/s44296-025-00093-5
Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.